Identification of key genes in calcific aortic valve disease by integrated bioinformatics analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is highly prevalent in our aging world and has no effective pharmaceutical treatment. Intense efforts have been made but the underlying molecular mechanisms of CAVD are still unclear.This study was designed to identify the critical genes and pathways in CAVD by bioinformatics analysis. Microarray datasets of GSE12644, GSE51472, and GSE83453 were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus database. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified and functional and pathway enrichment analysis was performed. Subsequently, the protein-protein interaction network (PPI) was constructed with Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes and was visualized with Cytoscape to identify the most significant module. Hub genes were identified by Cytoscape plugin cytoHubba.A total of 179 DEGs, including 101 upregulated genes and 78 downregulated genes, were identified. The enriched functions and pathways of the DEGs include inflammatory and immune response, chemotaxis, extracellular matrix (ECM) organization, complement and coagulation cascades, ECM receptor interaction, and focal adhesion. The most significant module in the PPI network was analyzed and genes among it were mainly enriched in chemotaxis, locomotory behavior, immune response, chemokine signaling pathway, and extracellular space. In addition, DEGs, with degrees ≥ 10 and the top 10 highest Maximal Chique Centrality (MCC) score, were identified as hub genes. CCR1, MMP9, VCAM1, and ITGAX, which were of the highest degree or MCC score, were manually reviewed.The DEGs and hub genes identified in the present study help us understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of CAVD and might serve as candidate therapeutic targets for CAVD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".