Effect of Novel Anteromedial Approach on Wound Complications Following Ankle Arthroplasty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate all wound complications following total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) before and after the implementation of a novel extensile anteromedial surgical approach. We further investigated patients and operative factors associated with wound complications. METHODS: A series of 660 TAAs were collected. The median follow-up was 84 months (range, 12-204 months). Minor wound complications included discoloration, swelling, or clinical concern that merited bringing the patient back sooner for review. Major wound complications included plastic surgical consultation, debridement by the nurse specialist, negative pressure therapy, or reoperation. All major complications initially had a course of empirical oral antibiotics. Since 2011, higher-risk patients have had their TAA performed through an extensile anteromedial approach. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (8.5%) had wound healing issues (17 major [2.6%], 39 minor [5.9%]). All issues became evident <21 days postoperatively. Inflammatory arthritis, smoking, and coronary disease were patient factors associated with major wound complications. Four patients were treated with negative pressure therapy, 4 with debridement in the operating room, and 2 eventually converted to fusions. Fourteen patients (82%) who had major complications had an ancillary procedure to balance the TAA through a separate incision. All major wound complications had an anterior surgical approach for their TAA. Before 2011, there were 13 major wound complications. Since 2012, there have been 4 major wound complications overall, with no wound complications in the anteromedial approach cohort. CONCLUSION: We recommend an extensile anteromedial approach for smokers and patients with heart disease or inflammatory arthritis undergoing TAA. If a wound complication developed, a multidisciplinary team to evaluate wounds was useful. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative series.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".