Synovial Sarcoma of the Female Genital Tract
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Synovial sarcoma most commonly occurs in the extremities but has rarely been described in the female genital tract. In this series, we describe the clinical, morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of 7 cases of vulvovaginal synovial sarcoma (vulva, n=6; vagina, n=1). We emphasize their wide morphologic spectrum, which can overlap significantly with other more common tumors at these sites, as highlighted by 2 cases initially diagnosed as other entities (endometrioid carcinoma and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor). The average patient age was 41 (range: 23 to 62) years and tumor size ranged from 0.8 to 7 cm. Histologically, the tumors were biphasic (n=6) and monophasic (n=1). All cases were confirmed with fluorescence in situ hybridization or sequencing, and 5/5 cases were positive for the novel immunohistochemical markers SSX and SS18-SSX. In 3 cases with follow-up, 2 patients died of disease and 1 was alive with no evidence of disease. Previously described cases arising in the female genital tract are also reviewed. Vulvovaginal monophasic synovial sarcoma raises a broad differential diagnosis, including smooth muscle tumors, spindled carcinomas, and melanoma. Biphasic synovial sarcoma may mimic Müllerian carcinosarcoma, endometrioid carcinoma with spindled, corded, and hyalinized elements, and mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma. Awareness that synovial sarcoma can occur in the female genital tract with a wide variety of histologic appearances is critical for correctly diagnosing this rare entity. In particular, synovial sarcoma should be considered for any deeply situated "adenocarcinoma" in the vulva, with attention to subtle spindle cell differentiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".