MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Uncertainties in breakup markers along the Iberian Newfoundland margin: The need for a new North Atlantic plate model

2020· article· en· W3042611885 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Annabel Causer, Lucía Pérez‐Díaz, Graeme Eagles, Jürgen Adam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyLithosphereSeafloor spreadingMagnetic anomalyRiftBasementBreakupContinental marginSeismologyCretaceousMantle (geology)Structural basinPaleontologyTectonicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Iberian-Newfoundland conjugate margins are one of the most extensively studied non-volcanic rifted margins in the world. In recent years, researchers have focused their efforts at better understanding the earliest stages of continental rifting, often relying heavily on the identification of so-called “break-up features” imaged in seismic profiles or interpreted from potential field data. Along the Iberian-Newfoundland margins, widely used break-up markers include interpretations of old magnetic anomalies from the M-Series, as well as the J-anomaly, believed to mark the occurrence and spatial extent of first oceanic lithosphere. However, uncertainties in the location and interpretation of these features have led to discrepancies between modelled depictions of the palaeopositions of Iberia and Newfoundland during the early Cretaceous as well as the timing of first seafloor spreading between the two. Using new seismic data from the Southern Newfoundland Basin (SNB) we are able to illustrate the unsuitability of “break-up” features along the Iberian – Newfoundland Margin for plate kinematic reconstructions. Our data shows that basement associated with the younger M-Series magnetic anomalies is comprised of exhumed mantle and magmatic additions, and most likely represents transitional domains and not true oceanic lithosphere. Magmatic activity in the SNB as early as M4 times (128 Ma), and the presence of SDR packages onlapping onto basement faults suggest that, at this time, plate divergence was still being accommodated by tectonic faulting. Therefore, young M-series anomalies (including the J-anomaly) are not suitable basis on which to reconstruct plate positions during the early stages of continental separation. We instead follow an alternative modelling approach, not reliant on the identification of extended continental margin features, to robustly constrain North Atlantic tectonics pre-M0 (~121 Ma) times. We do this by using seafloor spreading data and a statistically robust inversion method as the basis for a number of purpose built two-plate models for Africa, Iberia, Eurasia, Greenland and North America, with quantified uncertainties. Together, these models will provide an invaluable framework within to study the evolution of the extended continental margins immediately prior to and during continental separation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→