MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3042660012 · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.053110

Control of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math> air lasing

2020· article· lv· W3042660012 on OpenAlexaff
Mathew Britton, Marianna Lytova, Dong Hyuk Ko, Abdulaziz Alqasem, Peng Peng, D. M. Villeneuve, Chunmei Zhang, Ladan Arissian, P. B. Corkum

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. A/Physical review, A · 2020
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
FundersArmy Research Office
KeywordsPhysicsCoupling (piping)PopulationIonizationGround stateAtomic physicsCrystallographyIonQuantum mechanicsChemistryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A near-infrared laser generates gain on transitions between the $B^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}_{\text{u}}^{+}$ and $X^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}_{\text{g}}^{+}$ states of the nitrogen molecular cation in part by coupling the $X^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}_{\text{g}}^{+}$ and $A^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Pi}}_{\text{u}}$ states in the $V$ system. Traditional time resolved pump-probe measurements rely on postionization coupling by the pump pulse to initialize dynamics in the $A^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Pi}}_{\text{u}}$ state. Here we show that a weak second excitation pulse reduces ambiguity because it acts only on the ion independent of ionization. The additional control pulse can increase gain by moving population to the $A^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Pi}}_{\text{u}}$ state, which modifies the lasing emission in two distinct ways. The presence of fast decoherence on $X^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}_{\text{g}}^{+}$ to $A^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Pi}}_{\text{u}}$ transitions may prevent the formation of a coherent rotational wave packet in the ground state in our experiment, but the control pulse can reverse impulsive alignment by the pump pulse to remove rotational wave packets in the $B^{2}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Sigma}}_{\text{u}}^{+}$ state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0560.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. A/Physical review, ASame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207