MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Schumann resonance intensity as a precursor for warm ENSO episodes

2020· article· en· W3042708756 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gabriella Sátori, Tamás Bozóki, Earle Williams, Colin Price, Anirban Guha, Ciarán Beggan, Mariusz Neska, Mike Atkinson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntensity (physics)Schumann resonancesEl Niño Southern OscillationAnimal scienceIonospherePhysicsClimatologyGeologyBiologyGeophysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schumann resonances (SR) are the global electromagnetic resonances of the Earth-ionosphere cavity and constitute the extremely low frequency (< 100 Hz) radiation of the worldwide lightning activity (Schumann, 1952). The recording of SR intensity at a few distant SR stations is an efficient tool to monitor the global lightning. We present the variations of SR intensity in the transition months preceding the warm ENSO episodes for the two super El Niño events in 1997/98 and 2015/16 as well as for the two medium size El Niño periods in 2001/02 and 2008/09 based on SR observations at multiple locations.: Nagycenk, Hungary (47.6N, 16.7E); Hornsund, Svalbard (77.0N, 15.6E); Eskdalemuir, UK (55.3N, 3.2W); Alberta, Canada (51.9N, 111.5W); Boulder Creek, USA (37.2N, 122.1W). A remarkable increase in SR intensity is documented two-three months before or just at the beginning of El Niño episodes as compared with the SR intensity in the same months of the preceding La Niña (or non-ENSO) phase for all cases studied here. The percentage increase in SR intensity depends on the amplitude of the warm ENSO period, and is consistently higher for the two super El Niño events. The enhanced SR intensity indicates a worldwide response of global lightning activity. Increased atmospheric instability due to the land-ocean thermal interaction during the transition interval could be responsible for the intensification of lightning activity. This systematic behavior may have been overlooked in earlier studies that compared lightning activity in the integrated ‘cold’ and the ‘warm’ phases, but without exploring the transitional variation. Our results suggest that the SR intensity variation on the interannual time scale acts a precursor for the occurrence of warm ENSO episode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207