Delapan agenda pembangunan Provinsi NTT tahun 2013-2018 dalam agenda surat kabar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The implementation of the eight NTT Province development agendas (2013-2018) received attention in the daily news of Pos Kupang, Timor Ekspress and Victory News. The purpose of this study included identifying the quantity of news from the three newspapers, knowing the description of the news and testing the hypothesis of the different news coverage of three newspapers. The results of the analysis show that the most dominant news theme reported by Pos Kupang daily (71 news), Timor Ekspress (78 news) and Victory News (125 news) is the agenda of the development of populist economy and tourism. The description of the news by the Pos Kupang daily is dominated by neutral portrayals (109 news), Timor Ekspress is dominated by positive depictions (109 news) and Victory News is dominated by negative depictions (180 news). The results of the analysis show that there are significant differences in the news theme and news depiction of the NTT province's eight development agenda for 2013-2018 between the three newspapers. This confirms the importance of an issue that the media considers in determining the media agenda and the way the media express a reality. Keywords: NTT Province Development Agenda, Newspapers, Media Agenda
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".