Differentially Private Approximations of a Convex Hull in Low Dimensions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We give the first differentially private algorithms that estimate a variety of geometric features of points in the Euclidean space, such as diameter, width, volume of convex hull, min-bounding box, min-enclosing ball etc. Our work relies heavily on the notion of \emph{Tukey-depth}. Instead of (non-privately) approximating the convex-hull of the given set of points $P$, our algorithms approximate the geometric features of the $κ$-Tukey region induced by $P$ (all points of Tukey-depth $κ$ or greater). Moreover, our approximations are all bi-criteria: for any geometric feature $μ$ our $(α,Δ)$-approximation is a value "sandwiched" between $(1-α)μ(D_P(κ))$ and $(1+α)μ(D_P(κ-Δ))$. Our work is aimed at producing a \emph{$(α,Δ)$-kernel of $D_P(κ)$}, namely a set $\mathcal{S}$ such that (after a shift) it holds that $(1-α)D_P(κ)\subset \mathsf{CH}(\mathcal{S}) \subset (1+α)D_P(κ-Δ)$. We show that an analogous notion of a bi-critera approximation of a directional kernel, as originally proposed by Agarwal et al~[2004], \emph{fails} to give a kernel, and so we result to subtler notions of approximations of projections that do yield a kernel. First, we give differentially private algorithms that find $(α,Δ)$-kernels for a "fat" Tukey-region. Then, based on a private approximation of the min-bounding box, we find a transformation that does turn $D_P(κ)$ into a "fat" region \emph{but only if} its volume is proportional to the volume of $D_P(κ-Δ)$. Lastly, we give a novel private algorithm that finds a depth parameter $κ$ for which the volume of $D_P(κ)$ is comparable to $D_P(κ-Δ)$. We hope this work leads to the further study of the intersection of differential privacy and computational geometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".