MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Maturation and interhemispheric asymmetry in neurite density and orientation dispersion in early childhood

2020· article· en· W3043095919 on OpenAlexafffund
Dennis Dimond, Stella Heo, Amanda Ip, Christiane S. Rohr, Ryann Tansey, Kirk Graff, Thijs Dhollander, Robert E. Smith, Catherine Lebel, Deborah Dewey, Alan Connelly, Signe Bray

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsHotchkiss Brain InstituteAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Children's Hospital Research InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Innovates - Health SolutionsNational Imaging Facility
KeywordsDiffusion MRIWhite matterTractographyNeuriteNeurosciencePsychologyAnatomyBiologyMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The brain's white matter undergoes profound changes during early childhood, which are believed to underlie the rapid development of cognitive and behavioral skills during this period. Neurite density, and complexity of axonal projections, have been shown to change across the life span, though changes during early childhood are poorly characterized. Here, we utilize neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) to investigate maturational changes in tract-wise neurite density index (NDI) and orientation dispersion index (ODI) during early childhood. Additionally, we assess hemispheric asymmetry of tract-wise NDI and ODI values, and longitudinal changes. METHODS: Two sets of diffusion weighted images with different diffusion-weighting were collected from 125 typically developing children scanned at baseline (N = 125; age range = 4.14-7.29; F/M = 73/52), 6-month (N = 8; F/M = 8/0), and 12-month (N = 52; F/M = 39/13) timepoints. NODDI and template-based tractography using constrained spherical deconvolution were utilized to calculate NDI and ODI values for major white matter tracts. Mixed-effects models controlling for sex, handedness, and in-scanner head motion were utilized to assess developmental changes in tract-wise NDI and ODI. Additional mixed-effects models were used to assess interhemispheric differences in tract-wise NDI and ODI values and hemispheric asymmetries in tract-wise development. RESULTS: Maturational increases in NDI were seen in all major white matter tracts, though we did not observe the expected tract-wise pattern of maturational rates (e.g. fast commissural/projection and slow frontal/temporal tract change). ODI did not change significantly with age in any tract. We observed greater NDI and ODI values in the right as compared to the left hemisphere for most tracts, but no hemispheric asymmetry for rate of change with age. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that neurite density, but not orientation dispersion, increases with age during early childhood. In relation to NDI growth trends reported in infancy and late-childhood, our results suggest that early childhood may be a transitional period for neurite density maturation wherein commissural/projection fibers are approaching maturity, maturation in long range association fibers is increasing, and changes in limbic/frontal fibers remain modest. Rightward asymmetry in NDI and ODI values, but no asymmetry in developmental changes, suggests that rightward asymmetry of neurite density and orientation dispersion is established prior to age 4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImage→Same topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→