MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043104662 · doi:10.18280/ijsse.100303

Dynamic Response of a Partially Debonded Circular Lined Tunnel in the Overburden to SH-Wave

2020· article· en· W3043104662 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hui Qi, Yang Zhang, Fuqing Chu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Safety and Security Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOverburdenGeotechnical engineeringGeologyStructural engineeringEngineeringMaterials scienceForensic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using complex variable function and wave function expansion, this paper obtains the analytical solution to the scattering of steady-state planar SH-wave on a partially debonded circular lined tunnel in the overburden, and analyzes the accuracy of the solution.By the big circle method, the straight boundary between soil layers was converted into an arc boundary.Under continuous boundary conditions, the scattered wave field of debonded structure was constructed through Fourier series expansion, eliminating the need to process singular points on the edge of the debonded lining.According to the boundary conditions, a set of infinite integral equations was established, and solved by intercepting finite terms.After that, a numerical example was introduced to reveal how the dynamic stress concentration factor (DSCF) of the lining is affected by incident frequency, soil layer parameters, lining material, and debonding position.The results show that the DSCF of the partially debonded circular lined tunnel was obviously amplified by the soft overburden, but shielded by the hard overburden; Judging by the distribution and value of outer wall DSCF, rigid lining is affected by debonding more significantly than flexible lining.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Safety and Security EngineeringSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207