MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043172417 · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2020.3004572

Prescribed-Time Event-Triggered Bipartite Consensus of Multiagent Systems

2020· article· en· W3043172417 on OpenAlexaff
Xia Chen, Hao Yu, Fei Hao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersProject of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology ProgramNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBipartite graphLyapunov stabilitySettling timeMulti-agent systemControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceLyapunov functionAlgebraic graph theoryMathematicsControl (management)GraphTheoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceEngineeringControl engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article studies event-triggered control for the prescribed-time bipartite consensus of first-order multiagent systems. For each agent, the new event-triggered control law and triggering condition are constructed without continuous interneighboring communication. Based on the Lyapunov stability theory and the algebraic graph theory, permissible value ranges of the designed parameters are established to guarantee that all agents reach bipartite consensus in a completely prespecified time. Moreover, a comprehensive theoretical discussion is provided to show that the Zeno behavior can be excluded during the whole time span except the prespecified settling time T . The simulation results demonstrate the feasibility of the provided methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations193
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on CyberneticsSame topicDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsFrench-language works237,207