MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043187989 · doi:10.1063/5.0017922

Entry pressure correlations in capillary flow

2020· article· en· W3043187989 on OpenAlexaff
Ziyue Zhang, Savvas G. Hatzikiriakos

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRheometryCapillary actionPhysicsPolymerViscosityMechanicsShear stressFlow (mathematics)Shear flowShear (geology)Capillary lengthShear rateThermodynamicsComposite materialMaterials scienceNuclear magnetic resonance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The entry pressure in capillary rheometry is determined by using the Bagley correction method to accurately determine the viscosity of polymers at high shear rates. This method requires the use of at least three capillary dies having the same diameter and different lengths. In this paper, the entry pressure of over 40 sets of experimental data for different polymers is correlated as a function of wall shear stress for two different classes of polymers, namely, linear and branched. The derived correlations can directly be applied to correct the raw capillary data from a single capillary die, thus minimizing the experimental error, effort, and time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207