MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043284045 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2019-0391

Fisher information and Shannon entropy calculations for two-electron systems

2020· article· en· W3043284045 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ibraheem Nasser, Afaf Abdel‐Hady

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsYukawa potentialFisher informationElectronEntropy (arrow of time)Wave functionInformation theoryElectron densityQuantum mechanicsStatistical physicsAtomic physicsStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fisher information is calculated for the ground state of He-isoelectronic series, in position ([Formula: see text]) space. The results are given and discussed as a function of the nuclear charge (Z) and the screening parameter (λ) in the case study of Yukawa potential. Simple and explicit one-, two-, and three-correlated terms of Hylleraas wave function are used to focus on extracting the most characteristic physical features of the results. The numerical values of Fisher information are given in 1- and 2-electron charge densities, and their ratio of 2- to 1-electron densities results are defined and analyzed. To enable a comparison with others, the Fisher–Shannon information products, which measure the electron–electron correlation strength, are calculated in 1-electron density. The calculations of Fisher information, the ratio, and the Shannon-information products for two-electron systems in the presence of Yukawa potential are carried out for the first time in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsFrench-language works237,207