High-Throughput VLSI Architecture for GRAND
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Guessing Random Additive Noise Decoding (GRAND) is a recently proposed universal decoding algorithm for linear error correcting codes. Since GRAND does not depend on the structure of the code, it can be used for any code encountered in contemporary communication standards or may even be used for random linear network coding. This property makes this new algorithm particularly appealing. Instead of trying to decode the received vector, GRAND attempts to identify the noise that corrupted the codeword. To that end, GRAND relies on the generation of test error patterns that are successively applied to the received vector. In this paper, we propose the first hardware architecture for the GRAND algorithm. Considering GRAND with ABandonment (GRANDAB) that limits the number of test patterns, the proposed architecture only needs$2+{\sum}_{i=2}^n \ \left\lfloor\frac{i}{2} \right\rfloor$time steps to perform the${\sum}_{i=1}^3 \ \binom{n}{i}$queries required when AB = 3. For a code length of 128, our proposed hardware architecture demonstrates only a fraction (1.2%) of the total number of performed queries as time steps. Synthesis result using TSMC 65nm CMOS technology shows that average throughputs of 32 Gbps to 64 Gbps can be achieved at an SNR of 10 dB for a code length of 128 and code rates rate higher than 0.75, transmitted over an AWGN channel. Comparisons with a decoder tailored for a (79, 64) BCH code show that the proposed architecture can achieve a slightly higher average throughput at high SNRs, while obtaining the same decoding performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".