An Object Context Integrated Network for Joint Learning of Depth and Optical Flow
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Supervised depth prediction and optical flow estimation have achieved promising performance due to the advanced deep network architectures. Since the ground truths are difficult to be collected, many recent works try to learn the depth and flow in an unsupervised manner. However, existing methods only use features from convolutional layers or a simple aggregation of multi-level features to predict the depth and flow maps, which is insufficient to exploit context information. In this paper, we attempt to exploit object contextual information and investigate the effect of the object context for joint learning of depth and optical flow. Specifically, we present a novel combination of object context and the framework of joint learning depth and optical flow. Our proposed network can exploit and integrate the object context for both tasks by aggregating the context according to pair-wise similarities. Furthermore, we adopt the existing spatial pyramid network (SPN) to estimate the depth and flow in a coarse-to-fine strategy effectively. Given temporally adjacent stereo pairs, our network can be trained end-to-end in an unsupervised manner and can predict the depth and flow maps simultaneously. We conduct experiments on two publicly available datasets, KITTI2012 and KITTI2015. Our proposed approach yields comparable performance on both depth and flow tasks, compared to the recent deep learning-based approaches. Experimental results demonstrate that exploiting object contextual information is useful and beneficial for depth and optical flow estimation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it