Epitope Mapping for a Preclinical Bevacizumab (Avastin) Biosimilar on an Extended Construct of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A Using Millisecond Hydrogen–Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The success of bevacizumab (Avastin), a monoclonal antibody (mAb) anticancer drug targeting vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), has motivated the development of biosimilars. Establishing target epitope similarity using epitope mapping is a critical step in preclinical mAb biosimilar development. Here we use time-resolved electrospray ionization hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX) mass spectrometry to rapidly compare the epitopes of commercial Avastin and a biosimilar in preclinical development (ApoBev) on an extended construct of VEGF-A. The Avastin and ApoBev epitopes determined in our experiments agree with each other and with the known epitope derived from the Avastin Fab domain/truncated VEGF co-crystal structure. However, subtly different allosteric effects observed exclusively at short (millisecond) HDX labeling times may reflect a slightly different binding mode for ApoBev.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".