MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Real-time modelling of dangerous wind speed gusts and thermal comfort conditions in campus of Moscow State University (Moscow, Russian Federation)

2020· article· en· W3043340933 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pavel Konstantinov, A A Perkhurova, Elizaveta Nikolaeva, С. С. Букин, Mikhail Varentsov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWind and Air Flow Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWind speedEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyThermalThermal stateComputer scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wind speed modeling on microscale can be important not only for local authorities but also for citizens. Due to the heterogeneity of urban development in the Moscow region, wind gusts geography and thermal comfort conditions at different points in the same territory will differ noticeably with the same meteorological parameters. Thus, it is necessary to study such parameters at the microscale. Therefore, within the framework of this study, in order to inform the public about the negative impact of the weather, and further to minimize the consequences on the human body, an attempt was made to develop an operational system for predicting dangerous conditions of wind gusts and thermal comfort. In order to collect climate statistics, climate data were calculated for comfort conditions for the MSU campus using the RayMan model. Wind gusts modeling was performed using ENVI-MET model. Therefore, it is possible to analyze the changes in biometric conditions and wind speed in recent years and track trends in various locations. Since the input parameters for the RayMan diagnostic model, which processes only text documents, serve as predictive data for the Canadian GEM global meteorological parameters in grib2 format, a program for converting files using Command.exe and Fortran-90 language allowed us to create an online module for predicting biometric indices (UTCI, PET and mPET). For the convenience of perception of information, the results of calculations are visualized on the basis of Yandex maps. Research was supported by the grant program of Russian Foundation of Basic Research (project no. 19-35-70009 mol_a_mos ). The work of Pavel Konstantinov, Elizaveta Nikolaeva and Sergey Bukin was supported by Russian Science Foundation (project no. 19-77-30012)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWind and Air Flow StudiesFrench-language works237,207