Event-Triggered Fuzzy Flight Control of a Two-Degree-of-Freedom Helicopter System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, the problem of flight control for a two-degree-of-freedom helicopter system is studied. Since the helicopter is a multiinput, multioutput nonlinear control system, a Takagi–Sugeno (T–S) fuzzy model is applied to approximate the system. All submodels of the new T–S fuzzy model contain constant terms due to the nonlinear characteristics of the helicopter system. In this article, sampled-data control is considered and the sampled data are transmitted to the system over a communication network. A large amount of sampled data transmitted over the network can significantly increase the computational and communication burdens for the network with a limited bandwidth. To overcome this difficulty, an event-triggered mechanism is introduced. In order to validly control the T–S fuzzy system, a fuzzy proportional integral-derivative (PID) controller is designed based on the Lyapunov method and practical stability criteria, which are obtained by using improved integral inequalities and the linear matrix inequality technique. Finally, a numerical example is given to show the effectiveness of the obtained results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".