MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CURRÍCULO E JUDICIALIZAÇÃO NA MODERNIDADE: FUNDAMENTOS HISTÓRICOS EM RELAÇÃO

2020· article· pt· W3043407631 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista da FAEEBA- Educação e Contemporaneidade · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBrazilian Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsCascades (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

\nComo instrumento dileto para massificar a escola, o currículo emerge a serviço de uma forma de controle social sustentada na classificação e pasteurização dos conteúdos, com a função precípua de ensinar hierarquia e obediência a partir de um padrão de verdade. Ensinamentos imprescindíveis para a ordem jurídica liberal, sustentada no reconhecimento da verdade única, subjetivada como premissa à civilização. Uma tecnologia pedagógica que opera por meio de instrumentos (tais quais o currículo), que têm como efeito uma produção subjetiva que aciona procedimentos entendidos como externos e superiores aos profissionais, invisibilizando os efeitos de mutilação do pensamento próprios às práticas judicializadas. A grande conexão que a instituição escolar estabelece não é, portanto, com o saber ou o conhecimento, mas distribuindo a fatalidade de destinos sociais no interior de uma pirâmide cuja manutenção vai justificandose pela sua correspondência com a realidade da meritocracia.\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it