MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043419602 · doi:10.1063/5.0006765

Global ITG eigenmodes: From ballooning angle and radial shift to Reynolds stress and nonlinear saturation

2020· article· en· W3043419602 on OpenAlexafffund
J. J. Zielinski, M. Bécoulet, A. I. Smolyakov, X. Garbet, G. T. A. Huijsmans, Peter Beyer, S. Benkadda

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Plasmas · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsEUROfusion
KeywordsPhysicsBallooningHarmonicsTokamakRational surfaceNonlinear systemReynolds stressMechanicsClassical mechanicsDiamagnetismTurbulencePlasmaQuantum electrodynamicsMagnetic fieldQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present global linear and nonlinear simulations of ion temperature gradient instabilities based on a fluid formulation, with an adapted version of the JOREK code. These simulations are performed in realistic global tokamak equilibria based on the solution of the Grad–Shafranov equation. Benchmarking of linear growth rates was successfully completed with respect to previously published data. We find two distinct types of eigenstructures, depending on the magnetic shear. For high shear, when the coupling of poloidal harmonics is strong, ballooning-type eigenmodes are formed, which are up-down asymmetric with a finite ballooning angle, θ0. The poloidal harmonics which form the global eigenmode are found to demonstrate a radial shift, being centered well outside of their corresponding rational surface. Stronger diamagnetic effects increase both θ0 and proportionately shift the m harmonics to larger radii (by as much as two rational surfaces). In the low shear regime, the unstable eigenmodes become narrowly localized between neighboring pairs of rational surfaces, and exhibit no up-down asymmetry. Our simulations also show the generation of finite Reynolds stress due to nonlocal/global profile effects. This stress possesses both poloidally symmetric (n=m=0) and asymmetric (finite-m) components. Turbulent saturation in nonlinear simulations is demonstrated for both shear regimes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of PlasmasSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207