MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3043425100

An Evaluation of Ground-Freezing Methods in the Zone of Discontinuous Permafrost, Northwest Territories

2020· article· en· W3043425100 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elzbieta Mastej

Bibliographic record

VenueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostGeologyPhysical geographyGeomorphologyGeographyOceanography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Northwestern Canada is one of the most rapidly warming regions on Earth. The southern limit of the discontinuous permafrost zone is highly sensitive to small climatic fluctuations and presently experiencing a rapid landscape change due to accelerated permafrost thaw, which is further exacerbated by anthropogenic disturbances such as seismic exploration. Recent research has begun to examine both natural and mechanical approaches to minimize permafrost loss, although the utility of such methods in peatland environments is not well understood. This study explored the efficiency of natural and artificial ground cooling processes in a peatland environment by evaluating snow exclusion and thermosyphon methods. Ground-freezing devices have been used at the Scotty Creek Research Station in the Northwest Territories, Canada, since 2013 for experimental studies on permafrost stabilization and regeneration. Data arising from these studies were used in the present study to evaluate the effectiveness of specific designs and applications of such devices. The effect on ground freezing was evaluated for 7 freezing systems deployed along the seismic line: (a) two-phase, passive, 7-thermosyphon configuration, (b) single-phase, active thermosyphon, (c) single-phase, active, 4-thermosyphon configuration, (d) single-phase, passive, coaxial, non-insulated thermosyphon, (e) single-phase, passive, coaxial, insulated thermosyphon, (f) single-phase, active thermosyphon conjoined with the snow shading cone and, (g) four individual snow shading cones. It was found that the single-phase, active thermosyphon conjoined with the snow shading cone was the most effective ground freezing system in a highly saturated peat environment, reaching minimum ground temperatures between -13.3 to -14.2 o C 80 cm below the ground surface. Natural ground cooling by direct coupling of air and ground temperatures is strongly limited by the presence of snow however, average ground temperatures in the snow-reduced areas remained lower by only 0.7-1.2 o C within an 80 cm vertical profile than in the snow-covered areas, which suggests that other factors such as moisture content may exert dominant control over ground cooling range. Nonetheless, at the end of the summer snow-reduced areas maintained a 15 cm thick frozen layer at 60 -75 cm below the ground surface. We are proposing that systematic monitoring of snowpack development and decay can be used as a proxy for ground thermal profile evaluation. This study supports the feasibility of low cost, readily deployable ground freezing systems that can mitigate permafrost thaw and improve the adaptability of engineering designs to changing environmental conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)→Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→