Machine Learning Based PEVs Load Extraction and Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transformation of the energy sector due to the appearance of plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) has faced the researchers with challenges in recent years. The foremost challenge is uncertain behavior of a PEV that hinders operators determining a deterministic load profile. Load forecasting of PEVs is so crucial in both operating and planning of the energy systems. PEV load demand mainly depends on traveling behavior of them. This paper tries to present an accurate model to forecast PEVs’ traveling behavior in order to extract the PEV load profile. The presented model is based on machine-learning techniques; namely, a generalized regression neural network (GRNN) that correlates between PEVs’ arrival/departure times and traveling behavior is considered in the model. The results show the ability of the GRNN to communicate between arrival/departure times of PEVs and the distance traveled by them with a correlation coefficient (R) of 99.49% for training and 98.99% for tests. Therefore, the trained and saved GRNN model is ready to forecast PEVs’ trip length based on training and testing with historical data. Finally, the results indicate the importance of implementing more accurate methods to predict PEVs to gain the significant advantages in the importance of electrical energy in vehicles in the years to come.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it