MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043508299 · doi:10.24158/fik.2020.7.8

The Missionary Work of St. Innocent Veniaminov in the Yakutia: a Historiographical Review and Archival Sources

2020· review· en· W3043508299 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elena Stepanovna Rufova

Bibliographic record

VenueОбщество философия история культура · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Regulatory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoriographyPeriod (music)Context (archaeology)HistoryQuarter (Canadian coin)Subject (documents)Work (physics)EpistemologySociologyPhilosophyArchaeologyLibrary scienceComputer scienceAestheticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article attempts to study the works on the missionary activity of Innokenty Veniaminov in the Yakut region, to determine the degree of study of the problem, as well as to establish the stages of studying the topic and the contribution of researchers to the analysis of the problem. The chronological framework of the work from the position of historiographical context covers the period from the second quarter of the XIX century to the present. In the pre-revolutionary period, Christianization played an important role as a unifying factor in relations between peoples. The study considers the basic work on studying the contributions of St. innocent Veniaminov in Yakutsk region, and establishes stages of studying the topic, characteristics of periods and the contribution of research scientists in the analysis of the problem. The article also provides a brief analysis of the first translated publications in the Yakut language, which constitute the main source base of the work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0100.016
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueОбщество философия история культураSame topicLegal and Regulatory AnalysisFrench-language works237,207