MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043610351 · doi:10.18192/clg-cgl.v6i2.4753

La politique de l'emploi comme instrument de politique culturelle implicite

2020· article· fr· W3043610351 on OpenAlex
Robin Nelson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCulture and Local Governance · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsMacEwan UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersQueen's UniversityMcGill UniversityUniversité Laval
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex


 
 
 En 2002, le gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick a développé une politique culturelle d’une ampleur sans précédent pour la province. Cette politique devait répondre entre autres aux défis des musées communautaires. Parmi les défis identifiés, on faisait état alors des besoins quant au développement professionnel, à la stabilité financière et à la visibilité au sein de leurs communautés. Cet article étudie en quoi cette stratégie ambitieuse pour le secteur culturel s’est heurtée à des dynamiques propres à la voie choisie et à des effets croisés avec d’autres politiques publiques. En s’appuyant sur une analyse du secteur et de son évolution suite à la mise en œuvre de la politique culturelle, cet article relate les effets insoupçonnés du programme Stage d’emploi étudiant pour demain (SEED), un programme lié à la politique de la formation et de l’emploi de la province.
 
 

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it