Toward Task Autonomy in Robotic Cardiac Ablation: Learning-Based Kinematic Control of Soft Tendon-Driven Catheters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this study was to propose and validate a control framework with level-2 autonomy (task autonomy) for the control of flexible ablation catheters. To this end, a kinematic model for the flexible portion of typical ablation catheters was developed and a 40-mm-long spring-loaded flexible catheter was fabricated. The feasible space of the catheter was obtained experimentally. Furthermore, a robotic catheter intervention system was prototyped for controlling the length of the catheter tendons. The proposed control framework used a support vector machine classifier to determine the tendons to be driven, and a fully connected neural network regressor to determine the length of the tendons. The classifier and regressors were trained with the data from the feasible space. The control system was implemented in parallel at user-interface and firmware and exhibited a 0.4-s lag in following the input. The validation studies were four trajectory tracking and four target reaching experiments. The system was capable of tracking trajectories with an error of 0.49 ± 0.32 and 0.62 ± 0.36 mm in slow and fast trajectories, respectively. Also, it exhibited submillimeter accuracy in reaching three preplanned targets and ruling out one nonfeasible target autonomously. The results showed improved accuracy and repeatability of the position control compared with the recent literature. The proposed learning-based approach could be used in enabling task autonomy for catheter-based ablation therapies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".