MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043688339 · doi:10.37867/te100128

ROLE OF LIBRARIES IN THE ENRICHMENT OF CANADIAN STUDIES IN INDIA.

2018· article· en· W3043688339 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Priyanki Vyas, Kshama Parikh

Bibliographic record

VenueTowards Excellence · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLibrary Science and Information Literacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopularityService (business)The InternetFace (sociological concept)BusinessInformation technologyWorld Wide WebInformation systemKnowledge managementPublic relationsInternet privacyComputer sciencePolitical scienceMarketingSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The popularity of the Internet and the explosion of information are two major factors for the Librarians to face new challenges to look for new ways to meet the Patron’s expectations and new demands. Many innovative services can be possible by adopting new technology with traditional library information services to bring information to various Patrons. Foreign Language Study demands more information, Literature with more Information Services. This article explores how Library can be played Important Role to enhance Canadian Studies in India with information pushing programs, various innovative Service to maximize the related resources and services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTowards ExcellenceSame topicLibrary Science and Information LiteracyFrench-language works237,207