MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3043765562 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-508

Shallow geothermal technology as alternative to diesel heating of subarctic off-grid autochthonous communities in Northern Quebec (Canada)

2020· article· en· W3043765562 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nicoló Giordano, Evelyn Gunawan, Félix-Antoine Comeau, Mafalda M. Miranda, Hubert Langevin, Matteo Covelli, Paul Piché, Jessica Chicco, Stéphane Gibout, Didier Haillot, Alessandro Casasso, Giuseppe Mandrone, Cesare Comina, Richard Fortier, Jasmin Raymond

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalÉcole de Technologie SupérieureInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeothermal gradientGeothermal energyBoreholeEnvironmental sciencePermafrostThermal conductivityHydrology (agriculture)GeologyGeophysicsOceanographyGeotechnical engineeringPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the north of Québec (Canada), off-grid aboriginal communities rely on diesel for both space heating and electricity production. Renewable alternatives are therefore necessary to reduce the impact of burning diesel in a region with strong population growth and increasing energy needs. The main challenges are the subarctic environment (more than 8000 heating degree days), the presence of permafrost and the lack of local expertise on drilling and installation of borehole heat exchangers. The communities of Kuujjuaq (58 °N) and Whapmagoostui-Kuujjuarapik (W-K, 55 °N) were chosen as case studies to evaluate the shallow geothermal potential and predict the long-term behaviour of ground source heat pumps (GSHP) and underground thermal energy storage systems (UTES). Local geology mainly consists of low permeable and thermally conductive crystalline bedrock (thermal conductivity of 2-4 W/mK) underlying highly permeable, frost-susceptible and poorly conductive marine sediments (thermal conductivity of 1-1.5 W/mK), generally not thicker than 30-40 m. Electrical resistivity tomography and ground penetrating radar surveys have been carried out to locally evaluate the presence of ice-rich ground that strongly depends on the local hydrogeological conditions. Average underground temperature in the first 100 m is around 1 °C in Kuujjuaq and 2 °C in W-K. Geothermal gradient and heat flux were estimated to be on average 15 °C/km and 40 mW/m2, respectively. Results of the studies carried out in these villages show that both GSHP and UTES are viable technologies to replace part of the current diesel consumption of residential buildings and drinking water facilities, with 10% to 50% primary energy saving depending on the technology. Fifty years’ life-cycle cost analyses demonstrated that the levelized cost of energy for GSHP and UTES is as low as 0.10 and 0.19 USD$/kWh, respectively, compared to the business-as-usual scenario standing at 0.21 USD$/kWh. It also turned out that the energy and drilling costs are key obstacles to a widespread deployment of these technologies in the North. A cost of 110 USD$/m has been defined as a threshold for getting interesting paybacks on the initial financial investment. UTES is also a valuable technology aiming to extend the growing season of community greenhouses in place in both Kuujjuaq and W-K. In Kuujjuaq, a coupled daily and seasonal heat storage is under study to provide renewable heat and help increase the food security in Nunavik. Future activities aim at the set-up of a first demonstration plant to be tested in a subarctic environment with underground close to permafrost conditions. A 200-m well will be drilled in 2020 in W-K and the installation of a borehole heat exchanger will be showcased for technological transfer. Conventional thermal response tests (TRT) and a novel approach of oscillatory TRT will also be carried out to evaluate the in-situ thermal conductivity and heat capacity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→