MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043770067 · doi:10.7202/1070343ar

L’indépendance des auditeurs internes dans l’administration publique du Québec

2020· article· fr· W3043770067 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Eriole Zita Nonki Tadida, Pierre‐Marc Daigneault

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Gouvernance · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’audit interne est une fonction contributive à la performance gouvernementale. Pour atteindre son objectif qui est de donner une assurance raisonnable quant à la maîtrise des risques d’une organisation, les normes internationales et les textes régissant la fonction exigent qu’elle soit objective et indépendante. Cet article présente un état des lieux de l’indépendance des auditeurs internes dans l’administration publique du Québec et une analyse de ses implications. Les données de l’étude proviennent d’un portrait de la fonction d’audit interne dans les ministères et organismes réalisé par le Secrétariat du Conseil du trésor. Selon nos résultats, si les règles d’indépendance perçue sont bien établies dans l’administration publique québécoise, l’indépendance réelle des auditeurs internes pourrait être renforcée, et le comité d’audit pourrait jouer un rôle important en ce sens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue GouvernanceSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207