MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043780535

Durban: Hacia la solución vinculante

2012· article· es· W3043780535 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePre-bie3 · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicLaw, Ethics, and AI Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSummitPolitical scienceEuropean unionChinaHumanitiesGeographyCartographyInternational tradeLawBusinessArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolLa cumbre del cambio climatico celebrada en Durban el pasado mes de diciembre ha supuesto un prorroga del protocolo del Kioto que expira este ano y un compromiso de establecer un nuevo protocolo vinculante no mas tarde del 2015. Se trata de una solucion lo suficientemente abierta como para satisfacer a la mayoria de los participantes, entre ellos, la Union Europea, Estados Unidos y China. Entre los que muestran en desacuerdo figuran Rusia, Canada, Japon, India y la mayoria de las ONGs. EnglishThe climate change Summit in Durban last December has meant an extension of the Kyoto Protocol which expires this year and a commitment to establishing a new protocol binding no later than 2015. It is an open enough solution to satisfy most of the participants, including the European Union, United States and China. Among which show disagree are Russia, Canada and Japan and India and the majority of NGOs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.645
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it