Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo se inicia com uma breve história, que remete à cena inaugural da cultura ocidental. Essa epopeia começa com o projeto de Platão de manter a unidade da polis helênica submetendo o indivíduo ao coletivo. Diferente de outras culturas da época, os antigos Gregos buscavam as causas dos fenômenos físicos não nas divindades, mas nos próprios eventos da natureza. Entretanto, as “ilusões dos sentidos” enfraqueceriam nossa confiança na cognição baseada na experiência individual. Esta concepção está na base da epistemologia proposta séculos depois por Kant. Segundo ele, somente o pensamento independente de toda experiência sensível, isto é, a razão pura, poderia nos familiarizar com a “realidade externa”, resgatando a necessária confiança no processo cognitivo. Segundo Maffesoli, o fim da modernidade aponta sinais que mostram o advento de um racionalismo abstrato, que não mais se baseia na representação, mas na razão sensível. Fica então a questão: é possível o conhecimento sensível.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.051 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.021 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".