MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043827478 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.13365

Cohomological Hall algebras and perverse coherent sheaves on toric Calabi-Yau 3-folds

2020· preprint· en· W3043827478 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Miroslav Rapčák, Yan Soibelman, Yaping Yang, Gufang Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKing Saud UniversityGovernment of CanadaInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueSimons FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsYangianPure mathematicsCalabi–Yau manifoldConjectureMathematicsModuliAlgebra over a fieldAction (physics)PhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the Drinfeld double of the (equivariant spherical) Cohomological Hall algebra in the sense of Kontsevich and Soibelman, associated to a smooth toric Calabi-Yau 3-fold $X$. By general reasons, the COHA acts on the cohomology of the moduli spaces of certain perverse coherent systems on $X$ via "raising operators". Conjecturally the COHA action extends to an action of the Drinfeld double by adding the "lowering operators". In this paper, we show that the Drinfeld double is a generalization of the notion of the Cartan doubled Yangian defined earlier by Finkelberg and others. We extend this "$3d$ Calabi-Yau perspective" on the Lie theory furthermore by associating a root system to certain families of $X$. We formulate a conjecture that the above-mentioned action of the Drinfeld double factors through a shifted Yangian of the root system. The shift is explicitly determined by the moduli problem and the choice of stability conditions, and is expressed explicitly in terms of an intersection number in $X$. We check the conjectures in several examples, including a special case of an earlier conjecture of Costello.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.063 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207