Resilient Distributed Fuzzy Load Frequency Regulation for Power Systems Under Cross-Layer Random Denial-of-Service Attacks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, a novel distributed fuzzy load frequency control (LFC) approach is investigated for multiarea power systems under cross-layer attacks. The nonlinear factors existing in turbine dynamics and governor dynamics as well as the uncertain parameters therein are modeled and analyzed under the interval type-2 (IT2) Takagi–Sugeno (T–S) fuzzy framework. The cross-layer attacks threatening the stability of power systems are considered and modeled as an independent Bernoulli process, including denial-of-service (DoS) attacks in the cyber layer and phasor measurement unit (PMU) attacks in the physical layer. By using the Lyapunov theory, an area-dependent Lyapunov function is proposed and the sufficient conditions guaranteeing the system’s asymptotically stability with the area control error (ACE) signals satisfying <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\mathcal {H}_{\infty }$ </tex-math></inline-formula> performance are deduced. In simulations, we adopt a four-area power system to verify the resiliency enhancement of the presented distributed fuzzy control strategy against random cross-layer DoS attacks. Results show that the designed resilient controller can effectively regulate the load frequency under different cross-layer DoS attack probabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it