Resilient Distributed Fuzzy Load Frequency Regulation for Power Systems Under Cross-Layer Random Denial-of-Service Attacks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, a novel distributed fuzzy load frequency control (LFC) approach is investigated for multiarea power systems under cross-layer attacks. The nonlinear factors existing in turbine dynamics and governor dynamics as well as the uncertain parameters therein are modeled and analyzed under the interval type-2 (IT2) Takagi–Sugeno (T–S) fuzzy framework. The cross-layer attacks threatening the stability of power systems are considered and modeled as an independent Bernoulli process, including denial-of-service (DoS) attacks in the cyber layer and phasor measurement unit (PMU) attacks in the physical layer. By using the Lyapunov theory, an area-dependent Lyapunov function is proposed and the sufficient conditions guaranteeing the system’s asymptotically stability with the area control error (ACE) signals satisfying$\mathcal {H}_{\infty }$performance are deduced. In simulations, we adopt a four-area power system to verify the resiliency enhancement of the presented distributed fuzzy control strategy against random cross-layer DoS attacks. Results show that the designed resilient controller can effectively regulate the load frequency under different cross-layer DoS attack probabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".