Estimation of Internal Flow in the Nozzle for Cold Spray using the outer surface temperature
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cold spray (CS) is a thermal spraying method in which solid particles are mixed with an inert gas, accelerated at supersonic speed through a Laval nozzle, and collide with a substrate to form coating. The particle adhesion rate in CS nozzle strongly depends on the gas velocity of the working gas. Therefore, it is important to understand the flow condition inside the CS nozzle which accelerated the gas flow. One of the most traditional methods to diagnose the internal flow is to measure static pressure through thin ports. Although this method can accurately estimate the internal flow, it is not practical to apply to the commercial CS nozzle. Therefore, there is a need for a non-destructive measurement technique that can easily monitor the internal flow of the nozzle. In this study, we focused on the fact that the temperature of the compressible fluid depends on the velocity, and investigated the Mach number estimation method using the outer surface temperature of the nozzle. In addition, the Mach number obtained from the estimation method and the static wall pressure in the nozzle was compared to clarify the validity of the method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it