Intelligent Calibration of a Heavy-Duty Mechanical Arm in Coal Mine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate positioning of an airborne heavy-duty mechanical arm in coal mine, such as a roof bolter, is important for the efficiency and safety of coal mining. Its positioning accuracy is affected not only by geometric errors but also by nongeometric errors such as link and joint compliance. In this paper, a novel calibration method based on error limited genetic algorithm (ELGA) and regularized extreme learning machine (RELM) is proposed to improve the positioning accuracy of a roof bolter. To achieve the improvement, the ELGA is firstly implemented to identify the geometric parameters of the roof bolter’s kinematics model. Then, the residual positioning errors caused by nongeometric facts are compensated with the regularized extreme learning machine (RELM) network. Experiments were carried out to validate the proposed calibration method. The experimental results show that the root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean absolute error (MAE) between the actual mast end position and the nominal mast end position are reduced by more than 78.23%. It also shows the maximum absolute error (MAXE) between the actual mast end position and the nominal mast end position is reduced by more than 58.72% in the three directions of Cartesian coordinate system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".