MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3043967647 · doi:10.1002/ajb2.1508

Endopolyploidy is associated with leaf functional traits and climate variation in <i>Arabidopsis thaliana</i>

2020· article· en· W3043967647 on OpenAlexaff
Evan K. Pacey, Hafiz Maherali, Brian C. Husband

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Botany · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyHerbaceous plantBotanyPhenology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PREMISE: Endopolyploidy is widespread throughout the tree of life and is especially prevalent in herbaceous angiosperms. Its prevalence in this clade suggests that endopolyploidy may be adaptive, but its functional roles are poorly understood. To address this gap in knowledge, we explored whether endopolyploidy was associated with climatic factors and correlated with phenotypic traits related to growth. METHODS: We sampled stem and leaf endopolyploidy in 56 geographically separated accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana grown in a common garden to explore species variation and to determine whether this variation was correlated with climatic variables and other plant traits. RESULTS: Stem endopolyploidy was not associated with climate or other traits. However, leaf endopolyploidy was significantly higher in accessions from drier and colder environments. Moreover, leaf endopolyploidy was positively correlated with apparent chlorophyll content and leaf dry mass. CONCLUSIONS: Endopolyploidy may have a functional role in the storage of chloroplasts and starch, and it may offer an adaptive avenue of tissue growth in cold and dry environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.203

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of BotanySame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207