MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3044051773 · doi:10.5771/9783828874817

Autonomiebewegungen im Spiegel der Globalisierung

2020· book· en· W3044051773 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melissa Goossens

Bibliographic record

VenueTectum – ein Verlag in der Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft eBooks · 2020
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Systems and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobalizationAutonomyPolitical sciencePhenomenonSecessionRegional autonomyPolitical economyState (computer science)Economic systemEconomic geographyDevelopment economicsGeographySociologyEconomicsPoliticsLawEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research is an important contribution to the discussion about the influence of globalization processes on autonomy movements, since it shows the connection between autonomy efforts in South Tyrol, Flanders and Quebec and the influence of globalization processes on the respective states. On the three levels international, national and regional, the author shows how a new globalization conflict arises between proponents and opponents of globalization, which can affect domestic processes. This phenomenon is reflected in the rise of the various populist parties on both sides of the spectrum and the withdrawal into the national or regional level. With a view to regions with an autonomous movement, regional homogeneity and identity in contrast to the state are growing at the same time. If those regions show additionally a kind of quasi-state-configuration, globalization processes lead to increasing autonomy-movements or even to secession.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTectum – ein Verlag in der Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft eBooksSame topicPolitical Systems and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207