Subacute metformin treatment reduces inflammation and improves functional outcome following neonatal hypoxia ischemia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypoxia-ischemia (HI) injury is a leading cause of neonatal death and long-term disability, and existing treatment options for HI offer only modest benefit. Early intervention with the drug metformin has been shown to promote functional improvement in numerous rodent models of injury and has pleiotropic cellular effects in the brain. We have previously shown that 1 week of metformin treatment initiated 24 h after HI in neonatal mice resulted in improved motor and cognitive performance, activation of endogenous neural precursor cells (NPCs), and increased oligodendrogenesis. While promising, a limitation to this work is that immediate pharmacological intervention is not always possible in the clinic. Herein, we investigated whether delaying metformin treatment to begin in the subacute phase post-HI would still effectively promote recovery. Male and female C57/BL6 mice received HI injury postnatally, and metformin treatment began 7 days post-HI for up to 4 weeks. Motor and cognitive performance was assessed across time using behavioural tests (cylinder, foot fault, puzzle box). We found that metformin improved motor and cognitive behaviour, decreased inflammation, and increased oligodendrocytes in the motor cortex. Our present findings demonstrate that a clinically relevant subacute metformin treatment paradigm affords the potential to treat neonatal HI, and that improved outcomes occur through modulation of the inflammatory response and oligodendrogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it