MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3044081129 · doi:10.7202/1070333ar

Penser et représenter un troisième genre dans les Amériques (xvie-xviiie s.). Le massacre des « hommes-femmes », entre images et littérature

2020· article· fr· W3044081129 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Sara Petrella, Philippe Borgeaud

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontières · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette enquête a pour point de départ le motif iconographique et littéraire de la mise à mort de centaines d’Autochtones ordonnée en 1513 par l’Espagnol Núñez de Balboa, dans la région de l’actuel Panama. À travers l’étude de livres illustrés entre les xvi e et xviii e siècles, nous constatons que le concept d’« homme-femme » fut déplacé, puis transféré de « l’antique vers l’exotique », pour permettre d’appréhender une réalité méconnue des colons. Après une analyse de la mise en image du massacre par Théodore de Bry au xvi e siècle, nous traitons des considérations critiques et de l’analyse comparatiste de Joseph-François Lafitau, qui, au xviii e siècle, fait entrer les hommes-femmes dans le domaine de la religion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.560
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontièresSame topicColonialism, slavery, and tradeFrench-language works237,207