MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3044124577 · doi:10.32721/ctj.2020.68.2.ptp

Personal Tax Planning: Pack Your Suitcase! The Baggage of Canada's Departure Tax

2020· article· en· W3044124577 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Sonia Gandhi, Megan Dalton, Yooham Jung

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Policy and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidenceTax planningAd valorem taxBusinessValue-added taxValue (mathematics)Tax reformTax creditIndirect taxTax avoidanceEconomicsPublic economicsDemographic economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadians who choose to cease their residence in Canada and relocate outside the country may not be aware that their departure can come at a high tax cost. Leaving Canada can give rise to an unexpected and hefty tax bill because Canada imposes a departure tax on individuals who give up their Canadian residence. Relocating Canadians who hold certain assets may be deemed to have sold those assets, at fair market value, at the time of departure. This can give rise to tax even though the assets may not actually have been disposed of. In this article, the authors break through the complexities of Canada's departure tax regime by providing a comprehensive overview of the rules, highlighting key administrative considerations, and identifying planning opportunities to minimize Canada's exit tax.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1040.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienneSame topicCanadian Policy and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207