MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Discrete-Fourier-Transform-Based Framework for Analysis and Synthesis of Cylindrical <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline" overflow="scroll"><mml:mi>Omega</mml:mi></mml:math>-Bianisotropic Metasurfaces

2020· article· en· W3044159803 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Applied · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConformal mapRobustness (evolution)Lossless compressionScalar (mathematics)Algebraic numberLossy compressionElectromagnetic fieldTopology (electrical circuits)Field (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a framework for analyzing and designing cylindrical $\mathrm{omega}$-bianisotropic metasurfaces, inspired by mode matching and digital signal-processing techniques. Using the discrete Fourier transform, we decompose the electromagnetic field distributions into orthogonal cylindrical modes and convert the azimuthally varying metasurface constituent parameters into their respective spectra. Then, by invoking appropriate boundary conditions, we set up systems of algebraic equations, which can be rearranged to either predict the scattered fields of prespecified metasurfaces, or to synthesize metasurfaces, which support arbitrarily stipulated field transformations. The proposed framework facilitates the efficient evaluation of field distributions that satisfy local power conservation, which is one of the key difficulties involved with the design of passive and lossless scalar metasurfaces. It represents a promising solution to circumvent the need for active components, controlled power dissipation, or tensorial surface polarizabilities in many state-of-the-art conformal metasurface-based devices. To demonstrate the robustness and the versatility of the proposed technique, we design several devices intended for different applications and numerically verify them using finite-element simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review AppliedSame topicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207