PENGALAMAN ORANG TUA DALAM MERAWAT ANAK PENDERITA KANKER DI RUMAH HARAPAN YAYASAN VALENCIA JAKARTA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kanker merupakan penyakit kronis penyebab penting kematian pada anak. Penyakit kronis yang diderita anak dalam hal ini kanker, dapat memberikan respon yang berbeda-beda pada keluarga. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk diperolehnya informasi yang mendalam tentang pengalaman orang tua dalam merawat anak penderita kanker di Rumah Harapan Yayasan Valencia Jakarta. Metode yang digunakan adalah kualitatif, dengan Rapid Assessment Procedures (RAP). Pnelitian dilakukan pada Mei 2016. Populasi penelitian seluruh orang tua yang memiliki anak penderita kanker di Rumah Harapan. Pengambilan sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah menggunakan metode purposive sampling. Hasil penelitian menunjukan selama merawat anak yang menderita kanker, orang tua mengalami stress, diperlukannya perawatan khusus bagi pasien kanker, Diperlukan adanya dukungan dalam bentuk psikososial, material dan sosial terhadap orang tua, kondisi kesehatan anak menurun merupakan hambatan terbesar bagi orang tua, diperlukan kebutuhan material dalam mendukung keperawatan, spiritual dan psikososial bagi orang tua dalam merawat anak yang menderita kanker, serta adanya harapan orang tua agar anaknya segera sembuh.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".