Effectiveness of local injective therapy use for lumbosacral pain syndromes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness of local injection therapy in patients with lumbosacral pain during medical blockades. Methods and materials. The results of treatment of compressive lumbosacral radiculoischemia were studied in prospective trial with placebo control. One of the most valuable criteria of medical effectiveness was decrease of pain intensity by visual analog scale and McGill’s questionnaire. 58 patients were included in the study. Comparison between the groups was carried out depending on the treatment: first group was treated with combination of anesthetic with corticosteroids (diprospan), second group – only anesthetic. Rate of pain decrease was assessed during the first day and for 14 days. Results. In patients with lumbosacral pain treated with combination of anesthetic with corticosteroids, decrease of pain intensity was obtained by visual analog scale and McGill’s questionnaire point. Local corticosteroids use was the most effective with effect in a short time – during the first 24 hours. Conclusion. Short course of local injection therapy had high effectiveness in patients with lumbosacral pain syndrome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".