MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A dark seesaw solution to low energy anomalies: MiniBooNE, the muon (g − 2), and BaBar

2021· article· en· W3044343179 on OpenAlexafffund
Asli M. Abdullahi, Matheus Hostert, Silvia Pascoli

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Letters B · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersFP7 Ideas: European Research CouncilH2020 European Research CouncilInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionGovernment of CanadaH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsOntario Ministry of Economic Development, Job Creation and TradeMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoUK Research and Innovation
KeywordsMiniBooNEPhysicsParticle physicsMuonNeutrinoSeesaw molecular geometryLeptonStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Anomaly (physics)Nuclear physicsSterile neutrinoGauge (firearms)ElectronNeutrino oscillation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A recent update from MiniBooNE has strengthened the observed 4.8σ excess of e-like events. Motivated by this and other notable deviations from standard model predictions, such as the muon (g−2), we propose a solution to low energy anomalies through a dark neutrino sector. The model is renormalizable and can also explain light neutrino masses with an anomaly-free and dark U(1)′ gauge symmetry broken at the GeV scale. Large kinetic mixing leads to s-channel production of heavy neutral leptons at e+e− colliders, where we point out and explain a ≳2σ excess observed in the BaBar monophoton data. Our model is also compatible with anomalous e-like events seen at old accelerator experiments, as well as with an excess of double vertex signatures observed at CCFR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics Letters BSame topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesFrench-language works237,207