MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3044411022 · doi:10.34894/uwmslx

Duchy of Brabant GIS Collection

2020· dataset· W3044411022 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDataverseNL · 2020
Typedataset
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)DuchyCensusGeographyPopulationApartmentCartographyGenealogyHistoryArchaeologyDemographyPolitical scienceSociologyLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset, which accompanies the public website <a href="https://www.hertogdombrabant.nl" target="_blank">hertogdombrabant.nl</a>, contains several GIS files associated with the medieval Duchy of Brabant. These files have been adapted to correspond with the <a href="https://hdl.handle.net/10622/YGRTHJ">hearth censuses</a> and <a href="https://hdl.handle.net/10622/WGEKRX">fiscal repartitions</a> collected by myself and Arend-Elias Oostindiër. <br> The polygon GIS is an abridged adaptation of the <strong>'Historical Atlas of the Low Countries' (v7)</strong>, <a href="https://hdl.handle.net/10622/PGFYTM">which can be downloaded in full here</a>. The localities GIS contains a substantial summary of the fiscal data that can be downloaded in the links above, and is specially prepared for users not familiar with creating spatial joins. The cartogram GIS was created using <a href="http://scapetoad.choros.place" target="_blank">ScapeToad</a>. It is a collection of hexagons, each hexagon representing an equal share in the census or fiscal repartition. The boundaries GIS contains the borders of the Brabantine quarters, both in 1374 and 1437. <br><br> Two special additions are the GIS layer of all religious institutions within Brabant, as well as a few religious institutions outside the duchy that contributed in the ducal aids. The dataset combines the total population living within the walls of the institutions in 1526 (including professed and non-professed members, lay persons, secular priests, and personnel), and information on the institutes participation in the Estates and/or contribution to the ducal taxes. Please note that each administrative quarter interpreted the 1526 census slightly differently. Two examples make this clear. Whereas refuge houses are included in the quarter of Louvain, they are absent elsewhere. The quarter of 's-Hertogenbosch does include much more detailed information on hospices than the other quarters. More regular monastic convents are included in all four quarters.<br> Last but not least, the dataset includes a complete list of towns, noblemen, and prelates listed in the convocation of 1406. This list was created together with Dr. Mario Damen, based on a pre-existing edition and justification by Mario Damen <a href="https://doi.org/10.3406/bcrh.2016.4335" target="_blank">which can be found here</a>. It includes, when possible, the suspected place of origin of the person mentioned in the convocation lists. In many cases, only the bailiwick or quarter could be identified. In those cases, the person is listed in the capital of the bailiwick or quarter. This is clearly marked in the dataset. <br><br>All files are coupled with a QGIS symbology file, which provides the user with an example of how the GIS layers can be visualised.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDataverseNLSame topicHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityFrench-language works237,207