MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3044514952 · doi:10.1177/1045389x20942314

A novel bi-directional shear mode magneto-rheological elastomer vibration isolator

2020· article· en· W3044514952 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Jalali, Hashem Dianati, Mahmood Norouzi, Hossein Vatandoost, Mojtaba Ghatee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration Control and Rheological Fluids
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElastomerIsolatorMaterials scienceVibration isolationVibrationShear (geology)Magnetorheological elastomerRheologyAcousticsMagnetic fieldComposite materialMagnetorheological fluidEngineeringPhysicsElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a novel bi-directional shear mode magneto-rheological elastomer–based vibration isolator has been designed, fabricated, and characterized to improve the dynamic response and identification of this class of “intellectual” mechanical devices. A heuristic embodiment has been realized in order to design such an isolator wherein both the vertical and horizontal directions can be operated only in the shear mode not only individually but also simultaneously. Two fixtures have been designed for performing the characterization of the magneto-mechanical behavior of the proposed magneto-rheological elastomer isolator in the vertical and horizontal shear modes under wide ranges of strain amplitude (4%–32%), excitation frequency (1–8 Hz), and magnetic flux density (0–220 mT). Experimental results revealed maximum relative magneto-rheological effects of 35% and 27 % in the vertical and horizontal shear modes, respectively. Furthermore, basic mathematical models of single-degree-of-freedom systems, employing the magneto-rheological elastomer–based isolator in the vertical and horizontal shear modes, have been established. The proposed magneto-rheological elastomer isolator in the vertical mode exhibited natural frequency shift of 6.1% by a small increment in the magnetic flux density which approves the potential of the proposed bi-directional shear mode magneto-rheological elastomer–based vibration isolator for vibration control applications, such as seat suspension systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Intelligent Material Systems and StructuresSame topicVibration Control and Rheological FluidsFrench-language works237,207