Additive Gaussian noise model and Kalman filter to enhance controllability of gesture-controlled teleoperated soft actuators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soft actuators are used in bilateral systems as slave-side actuators. To broaden the applications and usage of these soft actuators in teleoperated applications required high accuracy and control. This article focuses on the improvement and control of the soft actuators operated through the Internet using a glove-based gesture control system. A hand-worn sensor glove (a glove with flex sensors and accelerometers) is used to detect hand gestures (specifically bending angle and force generated in a finger while gripping a spherical object) of an operator. The operator’s finger movements are mimicked in a remote location, through the Internet, in a soft actuator. The bending angles of the human finger have converted into the pressure variations inside the actuator using a linear calibration technique. A vertically mounted actuator and a spherical object are used to demonstrate the gripping action. The main problems that occurred during the controlling of this setup are noise and delays. Electronic noise (line noise and circuit noise), mechanical noise (vibration, nonuniformities in actuator fabrication, wear, and tear), elastic effect (energy absorbed during the state transformation), communication delays (delays occurred due to geography, telecommunication infrastructure, and round trip transmission), and other noises (other environmental effects) degraded the performance. This article considered a Brownian motion model, an additive Gaussian noise model, and a Kalman filter to solve these problems. The experimentations are performed in three different locations (to demonstrate the teleoperation) and the recorded improvement in the performance is approximately 17%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".