MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3044676990 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2020.3011381

An Online Self Cold Startup Methodology for PEM Fuel Cells in Vehicular Applications

2020· article· en· W3044676990 on OpenAlexafffund
Ali Amamou, Mohsen Kandidayeni, Sousso Kélouwani, Loïc Boulon

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsProton exchange membrane fuel cellFuel cellsCold start (automotive)Automotive engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringComputer scienceNuclear engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper puts forward an adaptive cold start strategy for a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) based on maximum power mode. The proposed strategy consists of a water evacuation process after PEMFC shutdown and a self-heating process at PEMFC cold startup. To maximize the performance of the suggested strategy, an optimal operating condition for the cold start procedure is sought first. In this respect, an experimental parametric study is performed to explore the impact of fan velocity, micro-short circuit, anode pressure, and purge procedure on the PEMFC cold start performance. After laying down the proper conditions, the proposed cold start procedure is implemented on a test bench for experimental validations. The self-heating process is based on an online adaptive algorithm that maximizes the PEMFC's internal heat depending on its operating parameters' variation. In fact, this algorithm attempts to keep the current density at high levels, leading to PEMFC's performance improvement achieved by membrane hydration and temperature increase. The experimental results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed strategy, which presents a fast and cost-effective PEMFC's cold start.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207