An Online Self Cold Startup Methodology for PEM Fuel Cells in Vehicular Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper puts forward an adaptive cold start strategy for a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) based on maximum power mode. The proposed strategy consists of a water evacuation process after PEMFC shutdown and a self-heating process at PEMFC cold startup. To maximize the performance of the suggested strategy, an optimal operating condition for the cold start procedure is sought first. In this respect, an experimental parametric study is performed to explore the impact of fan velocity, micro-short circuit, anode pressure, and purge procedure on the PEMFC cold start performance. After laying down the proper conditions, the proposed cold start procedure is implemented on a test bench for experimental validations. The self-heating process is based on an online adaptive algorithm that maximizes the PEMFC's internal heat depending on its operating parameters' variation. In fact, this algorithm attempts to keep the current density at high levels, leading to PEMFC's performance improvement achieved by membrane hydration and temperature increase. The experimental results confirm the effectiveness of the proposed strategy, which presents a fast and cost-effective PEMFC's cold start.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".