MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The new ball-rolling mill of EVRAZ NTMK – new possibilities for customers

2020· article· en· W3044700218 on OpenAlexaff
К. А. Ulegin, K. N. Shvedov, А. N. Borodin, V. Yu. Rubtsov

Bibliographic record

VenueFerrous Metallurgy Bulletin of Scientific Technical and Economic Information · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsEVRAZ (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrindingBall millMillBall (mathematics)Mechanical engineeringMetallurgyProduction lineAutomationEngineeringTemperingProcess engineeringManufacturing engineeringMaterials scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In view of increase of ferrous and nonferrous ores mining, the need for grinding balls, used for the ores grinding in the process of concentration, is also increasing. Description of technical solutions, realized at accomplishment of an investment project at JSC EVRAZ NTMK, presented. The investment project on the technical modification of the rail and beam shop included construction of the new ball-rolling mil further to production of steel grinding balls. The new ball-rolling mill, which was put into operation in 2018, has a possibility to produce ball of diameter from 60 up to 120 mm with hardness up to 5th group. The mill is equipped by an automation system of the process and balls stocking control. The ball production section comprises a walking beams heating furnace with automated heating modes to ensure energy-efficient operation; automated hot rolling mill for production grinding balls of 60 ‒ 120 mm diameter; balls thermal treatment line, including temperature leveling facility, quenching machine and tempering furnace. The system of the process automation enables to trace on-line all the technological parameters for production quality products, parameters of the environment to increase the energy efficiency of the section, and control system to create safety working area at the section. Within a year after the ball-rolling mill commissioning, the whole nomenclature series of balls was mastered and the passport productivity at each profile was reached. The maximum mill productivity obtained was 22 t/h. The JSC EVRAZ NTMK mill of grinding balls of 60 ‒ 120 mm diameter production meets all the modern market requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFerrous Metallurgy Bulletin of Scientific Technical and Economic InformationSame topicIndustrial Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207