Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The main interest and motivation to participate in wellness activities and programs seem to be an important part of the health promotion and chronic disease management. The relationship of Canadians with wellness and health reflects global development in this area of human behaviour last couple of years. The relationship of Canadians with wellness reflects North American history of last 25 years. Aim: Methods: In total 184 Canadian volunteers (70 males; 114 females) participated in the survey. It was used the diagnostic tool, ten-item questionnaire “Well_Awar_In”. Statistical analysis were based on relative frequencies and comparative analysis of selected categories. Results: The Canadian young adults have significantly better awareness about wellness as the persons from the older monitored groups. Age group differences document that younger population is more interested in wellness activities as a part of healthy life style and go. Conclusion: A spa and medical spa became places to relax, to manage chronic health issues or to look for overall life style or looks improvement. The global development of wellness movement, wellness industry, unsatisfactory state of health of general population despite medical technology and methods improvement, and media pressure last couple of years shifted focus of wellness related human activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".