MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3044858450 · doi:10.32721/ctj.2020.68.2.ustd

Selected US Tax Developments: The Unbearable Absurdity of the US Tax Rules for Withholding on Dispositions of Partnership Interests

2020· article· en· W3044858450 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael J. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Taxation and Avoidance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipStatutory lawBusinessLaw and economicsInternal revenueFinanceLawPolitical scienceEconomicsMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Section 1446(f) of the Internal Revenue Code requires the transferee of a partnership interest to withhold 10 percent of the amount realized by the transferor if, among other requirements, the transferor is a non-US person, a gain is recognized on the sale, and such gain is "effectively connected" with a US trade or business conducted by the partnership. The author of this article has examined the proposed regulations and other guidance implementing this provision and found them deficient in several respects. He points out that, unfortunately, they disregard the statutory requirements and generally require withholding by all transferees of partnership interests, anywhere in the world, even if the partnership has never conducted any activities within the United States. The proposed regulations and other guidance provide for limited exceptions, but as the author explains, the exceptions are unrealistic and wholly inadequate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienneSame topicCorporate Taxation and AvoidanceFrench-language works237,207